
|
Match Details
26.08.2000
Burnley team:
Crichton, Little, Thomas, Cox, Davis (2), Cook, Cooke (off 71), Briscoe, Weller (off 76), Ball, Gray (off 57), Mullin (on, 71), Payton (on, 76), Branch (on, 57), Mellon (sub), Armstrong (sub)
Wolverhampton Wanderers team: Oakes, Muscat, Naylor, Emblen, Bazeley, Ketsbaia (Camara, 81 ),
Sinton (Ndah, 45 ), Sedgley, Taylor, Lescott, Thetis. Subs not
used: Robinson, Osborn, Talia
Referee: M J Jones (Chester)
Reports
Not so much of a match report since I'm a bit rusty at
remembering the
details, more a series of impressions.Wolves 1 - 0 Burnley
Sedgely 74 First of all, can I say that regardless of its somewhat
questionable
aesthetics, Molineux was a welcome change from the likes of
Bloomfield Road.
On a mainly dry and slightly misty afternoon the Clarets lined up
as: Crichton Weller Thomas Davis Cox Briscoe Little Ball Cook Gray Cooke Subs: Mullin (Cooke 71), Payton (Weller 76), Branch (Gray 57)
Not used: Mellon, Armstrong Stan proved that he's his own and Gareth Kay's boss by fielding a
suspiciously similar 11 to that which started midweek. Because I
made the
stupid mistake of paying attention to TeamTalk I was unaware that
we'd
signed Nikolaos Mihopoulos on loan, but he didn't make it to the
bench, so
no goalkeeping cover. FIRST HALF The first half was a tight affair with only one clear chance for
either
side. Although Wolves probably shaded the midfield in terms of
possession,
they failed to find any decent service for their front two.
Taylor and
Ketsbaia had a pretty frustrating time and were well-marked
nearly all game,
the latter dropping of into midfield where he was either chased
by Cox or
picked up by Cook or Ball. Cook though had a bit of a stinker,
frequently
playing badly-considered passes and losing the ball when what
Burnley really
needed was to keep possession. Down the flanks, Weller had his hands full against the sharp Lee
Naylor and
Andy Sinton. Sinton got Weller booked early on, an event which
set the
pattern for the match as referee Jones, to say the least, had a
questionable
tendency to support the home side in any case of doubt (and some
even
clear-cut ones). Burnley's best chance came from a Paul Cook inswinging cross
which flew past
the heads of both Thomas and Weller at the far post when both
looked odds-on
to score. At the other end there was a free header after the
Burnley defence
failed to clear, which really should have been put away. Cooke
and Gray
though didn't really threaten, although Cooke wriggled away from
his marker
once but then dribbled in a pretty tame shot. There was another
booking,
this time for Cooke, as he challenged the goalkeeper (50-50 ball
and
goalscoring chance) but the Wolves over-reaction made it look far
worse than
it was. Although Cooke didn't retaliate as a Wolves player rushed
towards
him and try to bundle him over, he was still the only player to
be booked. Still, we rarely looked in any great trouble, despite not firing
on all
cylinders. As the teams went in for half-time serenaded by the
home fans'
boos, it was looking rosy. SECOND HALF Wolves brought on Ndah and switched to 3-5-2. This improved their
threat
from the left wing marginally, and from then on they had the
better chances.
The Clarets' attack lost its way, even with Gray making way for
Branch, and
play opened up completely in the midfield as Wolves went for a
winner. The goal, when it came, was a bit of a shambles. Burnley had been
attacking
and with both Cox and Thomas (?) going for the same header, the
ball sheared
out wide for Darren Bazeley. He delivered a cross which was
headed against
the foot of the post by Ndah, the ricochet eventually found its
way to
Ketsbaia who squared the ball for SEDGLEY, who despite doing his
best to
miss by firing it at a defender's legs, saw the ball bounce into
the net. So that was a big hole in the gameplan. Payts came on and
immediately
transformed the attack, but then failed to convert Burnley's best
chance of
the game. A beatiful moved which saw the ball worked out from the
right of
defence, across the centre of midfield and out to Briscoe, who
landed the
ball on Andy's head six yards out, only to see Oakes dig the
header out from
low at the far post. The referee still managed to lower his reputation further by
denying penalty
claims on Payton (dubious) and the magisterial Glen Little
(blatant). Then
with just a couple of minutes to go, Payton waltzed through on
the touchline
and fired across a sizzler. John Mullin met the oncoming drive
with his
forehead but couldn't keep the ball down and 2,800 Burnley fans
went home
disappointed.
THOUGHTS Eleventh in the table after three games is better than I had
expected, but
there are some warning signs from yesterday's game. Firstly as an
aside, the
standard of refereeing is little better in the First than the
Second
divisions and we can expect some real stinkers as the cleverness
of your
average opposition player outstrips that of the officials. What worries me more is that the lack of strength in depth of our
squad was
exposed slightly. Cooke and Gray struggled up front and although
we have one
good replacement, if more than one player misfires we're in
trouble. Payton
and Gray also look a bit too similar to play alongside each
other. In the
same vein, we didn't have a direct replacement to Paul Cook who
really had
quite a poor match in patches yesterday (maybe he thought he was
still with
Wolves). My other concern is that although we didn't really deserve to
lose this
match, we must start to pick up points in such games because in
the second
half of the season the rest of the division starts to suss out
your
gameplans and adapts accordingly (the Cambridge United effect, as
John Beck
can testify to). With the inevitable injury crises and poor runs
we're bound
to get, any extra points in the early part of the season are a
boon. Still, 3 games gone, one win one draw one defeat, mid-table, and
all to play
for! UTC Steve
BANK HOLIDAY WEEKENDER After looking forward immensely to the two weekend games
following the
Clarets excellent start to the season, I am left feeling
disappointed with
Burnley's results, performances and their overall approach to
these two
games. As I indicated in my preview I felt Wolves were definitely there
for the
taking. With the familiar hulking figure of Thetis lining up (on
loan from
Ipswich), introducing himself and sorting out where he was going
to play
with his newly acquainted colleagues, one of whom was a Wolves
youth product
thrown in because of injuries and lack of players, there had to
be
opportunities to exploit the Wolves' rearguard lack of
familiarity. The only
thing that could prevent this was ineptitude on Burnley's part or
a
committed attacking display on Wolves part to compensate. Those who were there can draw their own conclusions. Both sides
started
tentatively, the home side on the back of a home defeat to Oxford
United
currently in the bottom of Division Two. Wolves problem
apparently was
failure to convert chances, however with the sad lumbering Fat
Bob Taylor up
front and the somewhat mercurial Ketsbaia partnering him, added
to the rock
solid look of the Clarets rearguard, their main problem against
Burnley was
creating ANY chances. The closest they came until they scored was
when Coxy
sliced a clearance for a corner nearly catching Crichton out in
the first
minute. Meanwhile with Cooke looking very confident and Gray performing
an excellent
job at holding up the ball for the midfield to join up, the
Clarets appeared
to be gaining momentum as an attacking force. For a detailed Claret match view read Firmo's effort on the
London Clarets
site. http://www.geocities.com/Colosseum/Track/2593/0001wva1.htm I don't concur with Firm's report above that we created few
chances in the
1st half as I can remember two long range shots from Cooke and
Little.
Indeed very early on Glen forced Thetis into conceding possession
and
combined with Cooke in the box only former Glen to give Andy a
poor return
ball when a half decent pass would have set him up for a close
range pop at
goal. Added to a couple of dangerous crosses which fizzed across
the box
which just needed a nudge in, I felt that we looked marginally
the better
side. However one has to say that Wolves looked dis-jointed and
gave the
ball away a surprising amount of times. They look to be held
together in the
middle by the tall balding figure of Emblem on a number of
occasions. I viewed the second half with the usual mixed feelings, surely
Wolves can't
be that bad in the second half, however my pecker was up thanks
to the
Clarets fairly promising performance. The second half soon
provided the
answers with neither side starting at all well. Wolves had taken
off the
anonymous Sinton, who had allowed Weller acres of space, which
frankly he
failed to make much use of. However soon Stan began his own
mysterious
sequence of substitutions. Firstly he took off Gray for Branch
and later on
Cooke for Mullin. Myself I thought Cooke looked the forward most
likely to
score in the first half and Gray had done nothing wrong, whilst
in midfield
Cook had given the ball away quite a lot and Ball seemed to do
very little
except protect the back three. In effect Stan took off two forwards and replaced them with two
attacking
midfielders, playing loosely up front. Wolves so far had shown
little real
threat, and a bolder manager than Stan might have gone for the
jugular by
bring on the Guvnor early doors. Instead the result was Burnley
lost their
way up front and
struggled to maintain possession let alone construct any
threatening moves.
Nevertheless a point looked
comfortably in the bag until.......... The unlikely happened when yet another Burnley move petered out
when Cook
lobbed another percentage ball for a forward to chase resulting
in the
Wolves goalie gaining possession. A swift thrust down the Clarets
left
resulted in a cross and backpost downward header which I thought
Crichton
saved. The ball fell kindly and whacked back, pinballing through
a ruck of
players to Sedgely whose well struck shot hit a defender on the
line but
still went in. Their first effort on target. OK it was a scrambled goal but at least Wolves had shown some
ambition with
a midfield player getting forward into the opposition box. Stan immediately threw on Payton who hadn't even warmed up, with
15 minutes
to save the day. The impact of Payton was almost immediate when
he found
himself on the end of a Cook (?) cross and headed towards goal,
our first
effort on target. Payton single handed fashioned an opening for
Mullin when
his turn and pace were too quick for the Wolves defence. Even on
this
fifteen minute cameo Payton was easily the best forward on view. Disappointment was the overwhelming feeling at the final whistle,
and
personally I was perplexed as to why our leading scorer, a man
fresh from
scoring a hat trick in half an hour in midweek was left kicking
his heels
for so long in a match that was there to be won. It seemed to me
that Stan's
cautious approach cost at least one point, however in mitigation
Wolves
created a couple of good chances when the Clarets inevitably had
to get
forward and equalise. However Burnley could have added sharpness
up front by
playing Payton without losing and tightness at the back, indeed
Andy closes
down defenders alot more than Gray. Igor Errors? Comments? Opinions to add to this page? Mail us!
|