
|
Match Details
09.09.2000
Burnley team:
Crichton, Thomas , Davis (2) (off 45), Little, Cook, Cooke (off 71), Gray (off 57), Weller, Briscoe, Ball, Cox, Mullin (on, 45), Branch (on, 71), Payton (on, 57), Jepson (sub), Maylett (sub)
Crystal Palace team: Taylor, Austin (Forssell, 83 ), Fan Zhiyi, Ruddock, Mullins,
Morrison, Black, Gray, Harris (McKenzie, 64 ), Pollock, Harrison.
Subs not used: Evans, Hankin, Carlisle
Referee: J T Winter (Stockton-on-Tees)
Reports
PALATIAL SURROUNDINGSAnother visit to a ground that has been more or less been
completely
re-built since my last trip in 1983, although unlike Molyneux,
Palace look
to have taken the piecemeal approach and the away fans were
housed in what
turned out to be an environment remarkably like our beloved
Longside with
seats. Certainly the atmosphere was similar with the over hanging
roof
providing a nostalgic pillar or two but more importantly
fantastic acoustics
which amplified the volume to deafening proportions. Thus a boisterous crowd greeted the arrival of the players, and
true to form
Stan started with the same line up that drew with Gillingham and
lost to
Wolves. So, disappointingly, no Guvnor in the line up. However I
am told
that Stan indicated in his post match interviews that he is not
fully fit
yet. The opposition had not started the season well, however in
keeping with
their high aspirations a couple of well known Premiership "stars"
were on
view, notably Razor Ruddock and Dean Austin. According to the
programme
Palace had also taken three Premiership reserves on loan, but had
signed one
of them permanently. No doubt as the Premiership becomes
populated entirely
with foreign players, this will become an increasing trend in
order for the
top clubs back up players to get match practice and some return
on their
heavy investment in youth policies. Thus we had two Arsenal
"starlets" on
view. The rest of the side was made up of the excellent Palace
youth system
products that thankfully produced Cox and Little.
ROUND ONE After an early customary Crichton flap, the Clarets collection of
more
mundane journeymen foot soldiers looked to be containing the
threat. Very
little of any note was happening in either penalty area although
the home
side seemed to be playing the bulk of the football in the Clarets
half of
the pitch. My feeling is that the Clarets are tending to give the
ball away
a little too easily at the moment and need to cling on a bit more
at times,
rather than play some of the risky or percentage balls that they
seem to opt
for. I am sure that the instructions are to get it out wide and
down the
flanks a.s.a.p. as this seems to be the normal route. After about 25 minutes without looking particularly dangerous or
playing
particularly well, the home side were beginning to build up
pressure and
this resulted in a charge through the middle of the B.F.C.
defence with one
of their forwards slotting home. Much to our relief and surprise
the ref
gave offside, presumably for one the scorers standing in an
offside position
near the goal, because sitting directly in-line with the incident
the scorer
looked on-side. No matter, the ref is always right, especially
Jeff Winter. The half meandered to its close with the Clarets best effort
coming from a
Cox break out, run forward, one two with Cooke, ending with a
thundering
left foot drive which forced the keeper into a fine leaping save.
They had a
couple of corners and got into the opposition box occasionally,
but really
only troubled the Eagles goalie on that one occasion. However the
Clarets
looked fairly comfortable throughout, as frankly Palace didn't
look to have
a lot to offer. SECONDS AWAY Round two started with Mullin replacing Davis and a switch to
four four two.
This change immediately opened the game up and rather than
watching a game
of chess, played by blokes in coloured shirts, we were now
treated to the
real thing, a game of football. After one particularly good spell
of Burnley
pressure the crowd (except for GDK ) started baying for the
Guvnor. After
only twelve minutes, NBC began to get his kit off and our wish
was granted.
For a long spell NBC's only contribution was an impression of a
one cwt bag
of coal heaved down a chute, after the Chinaman Fan got a bit too
close to
the Guvnor's behind, resulting in an appropriate yellow card for
the hapless
Oriental, but initially Payton saw relatively little of the
ball. In the meantime Crichton and his defence were beginning to think
about
filling in their overtime sheets as they looked distinctly busy
with the
Palace wide men getting down the Clarets flanks or cutting in.
The closest
shaves were another Thomas goolie, when he headed the ball short
to
Admirable, who pulled off a blinding close range stop, when a
goal looked
certain. Later he pulled off an astonishing point blanker when a
Palace
forward from only 8/10 yards out was unable to beat him on the
line. At some
point while all this was going on Stan brought on more fresh legs
up front
in the shape of Branchy for the tireless Cooke, who yet again
worked hard
for little positive result, he even crashed the ball against the
post but
fortunately for him he was incorrectly given offside and was
spared the
embarrassment of missing a sitter. Presently the action shifted to the other end when the Guvnor
cashed in on
his earlier piece of work on the inscrutable Fan. With the
Chinaman standing
off Payton following his booking, the Guvnor effectuated a
sublime piece of
skill. In one precisely executed movement NBC took down a
difficult high
ball, swivelled and placed a golf putt ball into the path of
Branch coming
in from the right hand side of the pitch having timed his
diagonal run to
perfection. Branchy obtained immediate control and burst clear of
the
stranded Palace defence. With still some yards to go, he calmly
slotted past
the advancing keeper and the ball nestled in the corner. It was
an immensely
enjoyable moment for Graham, which he deservedly milked for all
it was worth
in front of us. Hopefully now any lingering doubts about
Branchy's
capabilities have been swept aside, as apart from the goal, he
looked the
part against the very effective Fan and the experienced Ruddock. Needless to say the last 15 minutes were more or less spent
camped in the
Clarets penalty box, and if I do have a real criticism of the
team it is
their tendency to eschew the short ball and keep possession and
go for the
long clearance, usually straight back to the opposition, in these
situations. Very close to the end one of their players broke
through in the
centre of the field and Mitchell managed to flatten him without
getting
himself sent off, but it produced a very dangerous situation
particularly
with Razor Ruddock available, but he blasted narrowly over.
However we
reckoned without the insatiable thirst for excitement of Mr
Winter who was
plainly cheesed off that the first half had been so dull.
Therefore he gave
a free kick at the edge of the area, inside the box against
Crichton for
deliberate time wasting, although he had been not significantly
slower that
on any other occasion in the afternoon. On these occasions the
refs are
always pratts, but refer back to rule one please. This time the kick was indirect, but a well worked routine
produced a real
pile driver from Fan which rocked the goalframe and nearly
rebounded into
the near touchline, a lucky escape, but poetic justice I felt.
Amazingly
there was more excitement to come with the Palace goalie coming
up for a
late corner and from a clearance the ball was blasted into the
net, but the
ref had already blown for time. PHEW A fantastic result, especially coming on the disappointment of
the last two
games and one that shoots the side away from the danger zone. I note that the press reports and Ceefax concluded that Burnley
had stolen
the points etc. Once again it seems that the Press boys have
taken the angle
that the Second Division new boys took advantage of their "luck"
at meeting
an out of sorts team, who were themselves "unlucky" on the day.
The fact is
that throughout Burnley defended resolutely and when the Palace
forwards did
break through Crichton was there to challenge them. Well, they
didn't match
him and they simply were not good enough on the day to score.
O.K. they hit
the goal frame, but in football that doesn't count. Games are not
like
modern "A" levels or even degrees where the result is awarded on
the basis
of continuous assessment. By contrast the Clarets had two really
clear cut
chances and put one in. Branchy "did" their goalie good and
proper with a
piece of finishing that was in the Payton class. In short a good
team
performance, and for two individuals and when the really big
questions were
asked, they had the answers. Palace can hand in all the written
work they
like but points are awarded for the number of goals scored for
and against.
Palace lost because they weren't good enough on the day to get a
result. Personally I was delighted with our positive second half
approach. Unlike
Molyneux where we were content to contain, Stan obviously guessed
correctly
that their attackers were not good enough and it was a calculated
risk to go
toe to toe. Even Ball got forward and put in his most positive
performance
so far, Glen was Glen, and John Mullin once again ran at them
with great
effect. With Payton and Branch up front we looked potentially
dangerous,
without creating too many clear cut chances. The defence were brilliant. A few more performances like this and those worries I told you
about should
ease.
Following on from my last post it seems the only thing I
correctly predicted
from my last post was that Stan would make a Charlie out of me,
having said
that we would lose if he picked the same side. Please call me Charlie. Something nil to Fulham on Tuesday, and hopefully my second name
will be
Wally on Wednesday. UTC & Keep Believing Charles Walter Igor Wowk
Errors? Comments? Opinions to add to this page? Mail us!
|