
|
Match Details
13.03.2001
Burnley team:
Mihopoulos, Weller, Cox, Davis (2), Thomas, Briscoe, Ball , Cook (off 76), Moore (off 88), Taylor, Mullin (off 81), Armstrong (on, 76), Payton (on, 88), Maylett (on, 81), Crichton (sub), West (sub)
Watford team: Baardsen, Cox, Panayi, Ward, Robinson, Smith, Vernazza, Nielsen,
Easton (Kennedy, 84 ), Helguson (Hyde, 69 ), Mooney. Subs not
used: Chamberlain, Page, Perpetuini
Referee: G Laws (Whitley Bay)
Reports
Am not too sure about Sam being in charge though, we drove past
the team hotel and saw a greying figure suspiciously like Stan
there. However, it didn't take a tactical genius to pick the team
we saw out there, which was fortunate.This was a strong all-round performance and quite unexpected.
Although we are still very light up front, the tightness at the
back meant we were always in it. And in addition, they played
like their contract negotiations depended on it... Line up (in the first half) Niko Thomas Davis Cox Briscoe Weller Ball Cook Mullin Moore Taylor in the second Mullin was given a much freer role before being
taken off. Note no Branch! Subs Payton Maylett Armstrong yadda yadda yadda Now that I come to sit down and think about it, I can't remember
much about the game. Burnley started brightly and continued in the same vein for much
of the first half. With Watford largely playing a 4-4-2 as well
the game was well balanced, with both teams having good passages
of play but failing to create any clear-cut opportunities. Burnley's best chances came with runs down both flanks and low
crosses which narrowly failed to find onrushing attackers.
However, we were getting in behind the Hornets' back four and
their somewhat chunky keeper Baardsen didn't really know what to
do with balls across the face of the goal, and it has to be said
the balls across were of a generally better quality than when
Little puts them over. It has to be said though, that we failed
to create a clear scoring opportunity in the first half, and any
balls went went
directly up to the front two immediately came straight back. The Clarets back four looked very good, with our only weaknesses
(a) the occasional inability to clear the ball from corners
decisively, Cox on one occasion having to put the ball out for a
corner after seemingly taking an age and (b) repeated confusion
as to whether NTG was calling for balls that really should have
been his. I know I was gilding the lily slightly when I named Lee
Briscoe as player of the season, but the difference in defensive
balance it makes when he plays is enormous. Future England
prospect Tommy
Smith made him look slow once early on but apart from that I
can't recall the Watford attack really getting behind the back
four all evening, being reduced to a sporadic stream of
long-range efforts. So a quiet but strong first half, only enlivened by the
ever-unreliable G. Laws as referee. You certainly can't accuse
him of bias though - he was equally unfair on both teams, with
some truly desperate decisions, helped out by two equally poor
linesmen. At least he only booked one player (Ball, for a very
poor challenge after letting a man through) The game in the second half was much more open as Mullin was
given a more advanced roving role and the remaining midfielders
operating a more central three. We then looked better going
forward in patches but Graham Taylor is no mug and took advantage
of the extra man in midfield to push the ball out to his wingers
who, as seems to be the general case in this division, rarely
got to the byline or were poor in their delivery, gifting balls
for the likes of Cox and Davis to clear. It was all getting a bit shambolic by the 73rd minute. We were
still playing the ball around well, but our only real chance had
been a sharp long-range half-volley on the turn from Moore when
Weller produced a piece of magic on the edge of the penalty area
of the right wing, flicked the ball up at Moore well outside the
near post. Moore made glancing contact with his head, and the
ball wrong-footed Baardsen, skipped across the goalmouth and was
being shepherded past the far post by two strapping Watford
defenders when TAYLOR, simultaneously sprinting and inching
towards the danger area, somehow launched his leg between the two
player and poked the ball into the back of the net. This was fairly unexpected and the resultant joy on the terraces
was complemented by an equal level of surprise because 0-0 was
the best most of us seemed to be looking for. This appeared to be
the concensus on the Burnley bench too because, after that it
was all hands to the pumps as Cook was withdrawn for Armstrong
and we sat tight. Even then there wasn't too much to fret over.
Commitment levels looked up 100% compared to the Portsmouth match
and you would have thought that Burnley were the team going for
promotion. Just one thing - I'm still worried by Ian Moore. He looks very
talented, but seems to lack any physical presence in or around
the box, a bit like a youth team player. Are we feeding him
enough pies? Steve
Errors? Comments? Opinions to add to this page? Mail us!
|